SINGLE BLOG ARTICLE

Following the JSE’s requirement for all listed companies to effect the King IV governance code by disclosing their remuneration policies and implementation reports, the high disparities between executive pay and employee wages has come up for public debate. While one can argue the differences in role, scope, skills, complexity and responsibility between a skilled employee and CEO, can one really justify upwards of 200 times salary differential?

King IV stipulates that a Board of Directors must approve a remuneration policy “that articulates and gives effect to its direction on fair, responsible and transparent remuneration”. The requirement for fair remuneration is also contained within Section 6 of the Employment Equity Act under the auspices of the international drive for “equal pay for work of equal value”.

Most organisations have considered the EE pay provisions by consulting their grading systems and pay practices, focusing on comparing same employees. However too few have considered the requirement to assess pay proportionality as well.

Credible studies, by Deloitte and PwC, indicate that executive director remuneration trends increasingly beat inflation, even considering guaranteed (base) pay alone. PwC’s 2017 rem trends report showed that chief executives of the top 10 JSE-listed companies earned an average base pay of R24.6 million per annum.

When one compares this with the average formal sector pay, as per the BankservAfrica Take-home Pay Index Jan 2018, at just R176 865 per annum, the difference is startling! Should we be surprised that employee organisations and trade unions are challenging the status quo and that the Department of Labour is beginning to place greater focus on the EEA4 Income Differentials reports submitted by designated employers annually?

Pay differentials, whether comparing individual performance in same jobs or employees holding differing roles across occupational levels, need to be unemotionally considered and justifiably defended within the bounds of the EEA and the Code of Good Practice.

It goes without saying that productivity and performance are intrinsically linked to reward and we concur that organisations should, wherever possible, link pay and performance to ensure fairness and the corresponding additional value creation with increased wages. However traditional remuneration practices could be challenged by reducing the overall Rand-value of executive performance bonuses and utilising this available cash to increase the performance pay opportunities throughout the business, especially at lower levels.

Reducing pay at executive level will arguably have little material impact on the individuals’ lifestyle but the corresponding change at lower levels will be fundamental. In addition to working towards a more conscious capitalism model, this simple change will meet all compliance drivers for reducing pay inequality and ensure that South Africa becomes a more equitable society.

If you’re interested in learning more about how GBS can assist you in considering how your remuneration policies and practices can be directed towards more equitable pay requirements, please contact me on natalies@globalbusiness.co.za.

remuneration policies, When is enough… too much?, Global Business Solutions, Global Business Solutions

RELATED POSTS

YES! Fast Facts

Posted on October 3, 2019

Newsflash: Parental, adoption and commissioning parental leave nears implementation

Posted on September 11, 2019

Labour Law Newsflash: Derivative Misconduct case law

Posted on July 4, 2019

New Critical Skills Survey

Posted on July 4, 2019

How to set your business’ EE targets in line with the Envisaged Amendments to the Employment Equity Act

Posted on June 28, 2019

Retrenchment Mistakes Employers Must Avoid

Posted on June 21, 2019

Amendments to the B-BBEE Codes of Good Practice

Posted on June 4, 2019

Work-Based Learning Programme Agreement Regulations

Posted on May 24, 2019

Strong Leadership Required

Posted on May 16, 2019

B-BBEE News snippets

Posted on May 10, 2019

Designated employers’ duty to inform and consult employees on Employment Equity Act

Posted on April 16, 2019

Parental Leave is in the making, but what about leave to care for elderly parents?

Posted on April 11, 2019

B-BBEE News: Ownership, Fronting and the success of YES

Posted on April 4, 2019

Equal Pay and Equal Treatment – the next big thing

Posted on March 29, 2019

Insights from our Annual Employment Conference 2019

Posted on March 15, 2019

Are Labour Laws Keeping Up With the Future of Work?

Posted on February 21, 2019

Workplace Skills Plan and Annual Training Report submission tips

Posted on February 15, 2019

New CCMA Rules & TES Ruling

Posted on January 31, 2019

Jonathan Goldberg appointed to NMW Commission

Posted on January 30, 2019

Various B-BBEE related matters, including how to determine the validity of a B-BBEE Certificate

Posted on January 25, 2019

Only 46 Days Left Before the Employment Equity Reporting Deadline

Posted on December 7, 2018

The importance of Discretionary Grant Funding

Posted on November 30, 2018

Labour Newsflash: a look at 2018

Posted on November 23, 2018

Newsflash: National Minimum Wage

Posted on November 22, 2018

Are Pay Practices Still Discriminating Against Designated Groups?

Posted on November 8, 2018

Sustained quality service is rooted in the health of the provider

Posted on November 1, 2018

BEE Codes: Youth Employment Services (YES) Amendments and Practice Note 1

Posted on October 26, 2018

As fuel costs soar has the time come to re-think remote working?

Posted on October 5, 2018

Labour Law Newsflash: Recent Constitutional Court Rulings

Posted on September 27, 2018

Draft Picketing Rules issued for public comment

Posted on September 27, 2018

Does Your Organisation Have a “Learning Culture”?

Posted on September 14, 2018

The benefits of sound ergonomics in the workplace

Posted on September 6, 2018

B-BBEE Codes: Youth Employment Services (YES)

Posted on August 30, 2018