Section 9 of the Constitution states that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law and prohibits unfair discrimination. However, the dividing line between what is fair and unfair discrimination sometimes becomes a bit blurry as can be seen in the case of Phahla/ Seven on Kelner another – (2018) 27 CCMA 7.1.13 .
An employee resigned from a special school. After she had resigned, she was re-employed as a substitute teacher. The employee then applied for a permanent post at the school but did not get the job.
As she had not been appointed, she claimed that she had suffered unfair discrimination on the basis that as she had previously resigned this was being used unfairly against her. As a result, she approached the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) and sought compensation.
The employer stated that the school only employed former employees, who had resigned, under exceptional circumstances. This policy was in place to discourage teachers from taking early retirement. However, this policy did not ban employing former employees who had resigned from applying for jobs. It was just one further criteria that was used in the assessment for position.
The employee had led no evidence that the action of the employer had impacted on her dignity so she had not proven that she had suffered unfair discrimination.
The case was therefore dismissed.
In order for something to be discriminatory more and more arbitrators are asking the question as to whether the action impacted on the dignity of the employee. If it did not, or there is no evidence to support this, the case of unfair discrimination normally fails.
Contact Global Business Solutions
Discrimination is one of the barriers to transformation, which is something that South Africa is struggling with at the moment. Make sure that you contribute to transformation in South Africa by making your organisation employment equity-compliant. Contact John Botha and the rest of the team to see how we can help. Contact us here.