Strategic Case Management: The Power of Pre-Arbitration Minutes in Labour Disputes

Grant Wilkinson
9 minutes ago
3 min read

The recent Labour Appeal Court decision in Alexkor Soc Limited and Another v Carstens (JA7/24) [2025] LAC has brought renewed focus to an often-overlooked but crucial aspect of labour dispute resolution: the validity and strategic importance of pre-arbitration/trial minutes.

The Legal Landscape: What the Courts Decided

The Alexkor case addressed a fundamental question that has significant implications for labour practitioners: Do the Labour Courts have jurisdiction to declare a pre-arbitration minute invalid?

While the court a quo dismissed the appellant's application to set aside the pre-arbitration minute, this case highlights the critical role these documents play in shaping the trajectory of labour disputes and the potential legal challenges they may face.

Understanding Pre-Arbitration Minutes: More Than Just Paperwork

Pre-arbitration minutes, governed by Rule 20 of the CCMA Rules, are far more than administrative formalities. They serve as the strategic blueprint for your entire case. A well-crafted pre-arbitration minute should include:

Essential Components:

Dispute Definition: Clear articulation of what parties were unable to settle
Common Cause Facts: Agreed-upon facts that need no further proof
Disputed Facts: Issues requiring evidence and determination
Relief Sought: Precise formulation of the remedy claimed
Procedural Agreements: How evidence will be presented, witness requirements, and time estimates

Strategic Elements Often Overlooked:

Discovery protocols: How documentary evidence will be exchanged
Expert evidence requirements: Early identification and notice provisions
Preliminary points: Addressing jurisdictional or procedural challenges upfront
Case management directions: Time estimates and hearing logistics

The Strategic Advantage: Narrowing Issues for Maximum Impact

Effective use of pre-arbitration minutes can transform your case strategy in several ways:

1. Issue Crystallisation

By clearly defining disputed and common cause facts, you force both parties to focus on what truly matters. This prevents the all-too-common scenario where hearings become unfocused fishing expeditions.

2. Evidence Planning

Early agreement on discovery and evidence presentation prevents last-minute surprises and ensures you have adequate time to prepare compelling submissions on the issues that actually matter.

3. Cost Management

When issues are properly narrowed, hearing time is reduced, witness requirements are clarified, and legal costs are contained. This is particularly important in labour disputes where proportionality matters.

4. Tactical Positioning

The pre-arbitration minute becomes your agreed roadmap. Parties cannot easily deviate from agreed positions without facing procedural challenges.

Practical Strategic Considerations

For Applicants:

Use the pre-arbitration conference to lock in favourable admissions
Ensure your relief claimed is specific and enforceable
Consider what facts you can get the respondent to agree are common cause

For Respondents:

Carefully review the proposed common cause facts
Ensure disputed facts are properly framed to support your defence
Consider preliminary points that might dispose of the matter early

For Both Parties:

Take time estimates seriously – they become binding commitments
Consider settlement possibilities even within the structure of the minutes
Use witness statement exchanges strategically, where agreed

The Broader Implication: Procedural Integrity

The Alexkor case reminds us that pre-arbitration minutes are not immune from legal challenge. This reinforces the importance of:

Proper representation during pre-arbitration conferences
Clear recording of what was actually agreed
Fair process in reaching agreements is reflected in the minutes

Looking Forward: Best Practices

Prepare thoroughly for pre-arbitration conferences – they're not mere formalities
Engage meaningfully in the process rather than going through the motions
Document carefully what is agreed and what remains in dispute
Use the minute strategically throughout the proceedings

Pre-arbitration minutes represent a significant opportunity for strategic case management that is often underutilised. The Alexkor decision serves as a timely reminder that these documents carry legal weight and can materially impact the trajectory of your case.

In an environment where labour courts are increasingly focused on case management and efficiency, practitioners who master the strategic use of pre-arbitration/trial minutes will find themselves with a significant competitive advantage.

The key is not just completing the pre-arbitration/trial minute but using it as a strategic tool to set your case up for success from the very beginning.

What are your experiences with pre-arbitration minutes? Have you found them useful for case management, or do you see them primarily as procedural requirements? Share your thoughts below.

Join us at our Mid-Year Labour Law Update, where we'll unpack over 40 cases, following themes that are emerging in case law and statutory amendments, and which can not be ignored (Digital Transformation and Employment Law; Recent Labour Court, Labour Appeal Court and Constitutional cases; NEDLAC Proposed amendments on the LRA, BCEA, EE, and NMW Acts; Risk Management and Compliance)

Innovation in LR Practices. This year's theme is Labour Law Evolution: The New Face of

Labour Relations & Case Law in Disrupted Businesses. What you'll gain: